Search

Home
Staff
Theophile Bigirumurame Andy Bryant Thomas Chadwick Svetlana Cherlin Mike Cole Holly Fisher Tony Fouweather Michael Grayling Shaun Hiu Valentina Mamasoula John Matthews Helen Mossop Jérémie Nsengimana Vicky Ryan Dawn Teare James Wason Faye Williamson Nina Wilson Haiyan Zheng
PhD students
Ruqayya Azher Aritra Mukherjee Luke Ouma Samuel Sarkodie Lou Whitehead
Methodology research
Overview Adaptive designs
Projects
Publications
News
Contact

Shen J

Surveillance versus ablation for incidentally diagnosed small renal tumours: The SURAB feasibility RCT
Intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill (EPICC): A multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: The INVESTIGATE-I study
Extra Physiotherapy in Critical Care (EPICC) trial protocol: A randomised controlled trial of intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill
Re: Hilton P, Bryant A, Howel D, McColl E, Buckley BS, Lucas MG, et al. Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: A survey within a mixed methods feasibility study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(8):1223–30
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): A mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women