Search

Home
Staff
Sarah Al Ashmori Theophile Bigirumurame Andy Bryant Thomas Chadwick Svetlana Cherlin Mike Cole Holly Fisher Tony Fouweather Shaun Hiu Dorcas Kareithi Ann Breeze Konkoth Nan Lin Jingky Lozano-Kuehne Helen Mossop Ellen Moss Jérémie Nsengimana Vicky Ryan Marzieh Shahmandi Moha Shojaei Dawn Teare James Wason Faye Williamson Nina Wilson Sylvia Zhang
PhD students
Ruqayya Azher Nicole Cizauskas Laura Etfer Niamh Fitzgerald Raiann Hamshaw Aritra Mukherjee Pela Okorie Samuel Sarkodie Lou Whitehead
Methodology research
Overview Adaptive designs Master protocols Transforming IMID trials
Projects
Publications
News
Courses
Adaptive Designs and Multiple Testing Procedures Leveraging External Information Precision Medicine Clinical Trials
Contact

Tincello DG

A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: The INVESTIGATE-I study
Re: Hilton P, Bryant A, Howel D, McColl E, Buckley BS, Lucas MG, et al. Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: A survey within a mixed methods feasibility study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(8):1223–30
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): A mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women
Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: A survey within a mixed methods feasibility study

Published with Wowchemy — the free, open source website builder that empowers creators.